Computation of geostrophic streamfunction, its derivatives, and error estimates from an array of CPIES in Drake Passage

Example of objectively mapped fields (vectors and line contours) and dimensional errors
TitleComputation of geostrophic streamfunction, its derivatives, and error estimates from an array of CPIES in Drake Passage
Publication TypeJournal Article
Year of Publication2014
AuthorsFiring Y.L, Chereskin TK, Watts D.R, Tracey K.L, Provost C.
JournalJournal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology
Volume31
Pagination656-680
Date Published2014/03
Type of ArticleArticle
ISBN Number0739-0572
Accession NumberWOS:000336222800008
Keywordsabsolute velocity; Acoustic; advection; antarctic circumpolar current; atlantic; currents; doppler current; effects; fields; gravest empirical mode; gulf-stream; In situ oceanic observations; inverted echo sounders; measurements; Profilers; Southern Ocean; southern-ocean; Streamfunction; transport
Abstract

Current and pressure-recording inverted echo sounders (CPIES) were deployed in an eddy-resolving local dynamics array (LDA) in the eddy-rich polar frontal zone (PFZ) in Drake Passage as part of the cDrake experiment. Methods are described for calculating barotropic and baroclinic geostrophic streamfunction and its first, second, and third derivatives by objective mapping of current, pressure, or geopotential height anomaly data from a two-dimensional array of CPIES like the cDrake LDA.Modifications to previous methods result in improved dimensional error estimates on velocity and higher streamfunction derivatives. Simulations are used to test the reproduction of higher derivatives of streamfunction and to verify mapping error estimates. Three-day low-pass-filtered velocity in and around the cDrake LDA can be mapped with errors of 0.04 m s(-1) at 4000 dbar, increasing to 0.13 m s(-1) at the sea surface; these errors are small compared to typical speeds observed at these levels, 0.2 and 0.65 m s(-1), respectively. Errors on vorticity are 9 x 10(-6) s(-1) near the surface, decreasing with depth to 3 x 10(-6) s(-1) at 4000 dbar, whereas vorticities in the PFZ eddy field are 4 x 10(-5) s(-1) (surface) to 1.3 x 10(-5) s(-1) (4000 dbar). Vorticity gradient errors range from 4 x 10(-10) to 2 x 10(-10) m (-1) s(-1), just under half the size of typical PFZ vorticity gradients. Comparisons between cDrake mapped temperature and velocity fields and independent observations (moored current and temperature, lowered acoustic Doppler current profiler velocity, and satellite-derived surface currents) help validate the cDrake method and results.

DOI10.1175/jtech-d-13-00142.1
Short TitleJ. Atmos. Ocean. Technol.
Impact: 

"This work has focused on methods for producing maps of the mesoscale geostrophic flow field in Drake Passage from CPIES measurements. The simulations and the comparisons with independent data give us confidence that the method described here can be used to compute higher-order derivatives of daily geostrophic streamfunction in the interior of a two-dimensional array of CPIES like the cDrake LDA, with accurate uncertainty estimates. Additional investigations using these mapped fields to elucidate various mesoscale processes occurring in Drake Passage are ongoing and include examination of the role of eddies in the momentum and vorticity balances and in the transport of heat, buoyancy, and potential vorticity." -- from the authors

Integrated Research Themes: 
Student Publication: 
No
sharknado