Coronavirus Information for the UC San Diego Community

Our leaders are working closely with federal and state officials to ensure your ongoing safety at the university. Stay up to date with the latest developments. Learn more.

Performance benchmarks for a next generation numerical dynamo model

TitlePerformance benchmarks for a next generation numerical dynamo model
Publication TypeJournal Article
Year of Publication2016
AuthorsMatsui H., Heien E., Aubert J., Aurnou J.M, Avery M., Brown B., Buffett B.A, Busse F., Christensen U.R, Davies CJ, Featherstone N., Gastine T., Glatzmaier G.A, Gubbins D, Guermond J.L, Hayashi Y.Y, Hollerbach R., Hwang L.J, Jackson A., Jones C.A, Jiang W.Y, Kellogg L.H, Kuang W.J, Landeau M., Marti P., Olson P., Ribeiro A., Sasaki Y., Schaeffer N., Simitev R.D, Sheyko A., Silva L., Stanley S., Takahashi F., Takehiro S., Wicht J., Willis A.P
JournalGeochemistry Geophysics Geosystems
Date Published2016/05
Type of ArticleArticle
ISBN Number1525-2027
Accession NumberWOS:000379525100002
Keywordsbenchmark; boundary; convection; core; equations; finite-element-method; fluid shells; geodynamo; geofem platform; high-performance computing; magnetic-field; magnetohydrodynamics; rotating spherical-shell; simulation

Numerical simulations of the geodynamo have successfully represented many observable characteristics of the geomagnetic field, yielding insight into the fundamental processes that generate magnetic fields in the Earth's core. Because of limited spatial resolution, however, the diffusivities in numerical dynamo models are much larger than those in the Earth's core, and consequently, questions remain about how realistic these models are. The typical strategy used to address this issue has been to continue to increase the resolution of these quasi-laminar models with increasing computational resources, thus pushing them toward more realistic parameter regimes. We assess which methods are most promising for the next generation of supercomputers, which will offer access to O(10(6)) processor cores for large problems. Here we report performance and accuracy benchmarks from 15 dynamo codes that employ a range of numerical and parallelization methods. Computational performance is assessed on the basis of weak and strong scaling behavior up to 16,384 processor cores. Extrapolations of our weak-scaling results indicate that dynamo codes that employ two-dimensional or three-dimensional domain decompositions can perform efficiently on up to approximate to 10(6) processor cores, paving the way for more realistic simulations in the next model generation.

Short TitleGeochem. Geophys. Geosyst.
Student Publication: