Coronavirus Information for the UC San Diego Community

Our leaders are working closely with federal and state officials to ensure your ongoing safety at the university. Stay up to date with the latest developments. Learn more.

Two new meiofaunal species of Trilobodrilus (Dinophilidae, Annelida) from California, USA

TitleTwo new meiofaunal species of Trilobodrilus (Dinophilidae, Annelida) from California, USA
Publication TypeJournal Article
Year of Publication2018
AuthorsKerbl A., Vereide E.H, Gonzalez B.C, Rouse GW, Worsaae K.
Date Published2018/04
Type of ArticleArticle
ISBN Number2118-9773
Accession NumberWOS:000429004900001
Keywordsdatasets; DNA; genus; interstitial; intertidal zone; Meiobenthos; morphology; polychaeta; sea; software; zoology

We describe two new species of the annelid genus Trilobodrilus Remane, 1925 (Dinophilidae Verill, 1892) from an intertidal and a subtidal location in San Diego, California. These two species show morphological and molecular divergences between each other and the previously described, geographically distant species. Intertidal T. windansea sp. nov. differs from subtidal T. ellenscrippsae sp. nov. most remarkably in the number and pattern of ciliary tufts and bands on the prostomium and along the body length, besides showing ca. 15% difference in gene fragments of COI and CytB. Trilobodrilus windansea sp. nov., though nesting with T. ellenscrippsae sp. nov. in the molecular phylogenetic analyses, morphologically resembles the Japanese T. itoi Kajihara, Ikoma, Yamasaki & Hiruta, 2015 most closely, but still differs from this species in the higher number of apical ciliary tufts, an additional ciliary row posterior to the second ciliary band, and by lacking a forth ciliary band and segmentally arranged lateral ciliary tufts. Trilobodrilus ellenscrippsae sp. nov. is morphologically most similar to the Japanese T. nipponicus Uchida & Okuda, 1943, but is much shorter, has more apical ciliary tufts, and less regularly arranged lateral ciliary tufts along the body. All species differ significantly in all compared gene fragments, and no obvious correlation was found between habitat and the species morphology or relationships.

Student Publication: